Structuring the Counter-Discourses in Anand Patwardhan’s Documentary Oeuvre
Anand Patwardhan’s documentary oeuvre has established itself as a resistance cinema of the Third-World, drawing influences from the Latin-American cinematic practices as against the agit-prop of 1907 Russian revolutionary tradition as well as the American and Grierson tradition of filmmaking. In India, while the revisionary historiography fills in these lacunas of providing multiple narratives and voices to the disparate growth story of the nation, independent political documentaries (IDP) and especially Patwardhan’s work provide an inevitable visual-dimension to such narratives of growth and development, functioning as crucial sources of intervention to history and cinema both. His documentary projects have well-spoken against the indigenous fundamentalism, sectarian and communal antagonism, casteism and religious riots and has been touted as a critical whistleblower to the miscellaneous malpractices in government institutions. Despite being rejected, censored and having being faced other obstacles form the monopolized CBFC and Film Division, apart from the independent wrath of belligerent forces and cultural diktats, Patwardhan has been an unstoppable and controversial filmmaker.
Anandverite.“Pita Putra aurdharmyudh/ Father, Son and Holy War.”YouTube. 31 May 2011. Web
Balagopal, K. “Why did December 6, 1992 Happen?” EPW. 2 Sep 1993.
Barucha, Rustom. “Dismantling Men-Crisis of Male Identity in Father Son and Holy War.”EPW.Vol. 30, No. 26. 01 July 1995.
Bilgraami, Akeel. “The Stubborn Idealism of AnandPatwardhan.” Films of AnandPatwardhan.Web. 12 Feb 2016
Chaitanya, Jagdish. “Ram keNaam: Documentary as Resistance.” EPW.28.49 4 Dec 1993:2646-2647. Web.08 Aug 2014 http://www.jstor.org/stable/4400485
Coronel, Sheila. “Corruption and the Watchdog Role of the News Media.”The Media as the Watchdog.NewYork: Columbia UP, 2008
Dobb, Maurice. A Contribution to the Critique of Political Economy. New Delhi:Rahul Foundation, 2011.
Dutta, MAdhusudhan. In Defense of Political Documentary.Web. 2 Feb 2011
Engles, Friedrich. The Origin of the Family, Private Property and the State.Intro. Michele Barrett. Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1985.
Korossi, Georgia. “Earth Vision: Interview with AnandPatwardhan.” Patwardhan.com. Web. 23 March 2014
Marx, K & Friedrich Engles.“Marx to Seigfried Meyer and August Vogt in New York.”Selected Correspondance. New York: Progress Publishers, 1975.
Raj, M.C. Dalitology.Tumbkaur: Ambedkar Resource Centre, 2001.
Ramanan, Suman. “We are not your Monkeys.”The Independent. Web. 2 Aug 2013
Raza, Mir Ali &Amitava Kumar. “I never set out to be a cultural activist”: A
Renov, Michael. “Towards a Poetics of Documentary.”Theorizing Documentary. New York: Routledge, 1993.
Seth, Sanjay. Marxist Theory and Nationalist Politics: The Case of Colonial India. New Delhi: SAGE Publishers, 1995.
Sherlock, Stephen. “Berlin, Moscow and Bombay: The Marxism that India Inherited.” South Asia.Vol. XXI, No.1 1998:63-76. Web 06 July 2013
https://www2.warwick.ac.uk/fac/arts/history/students/modules/hi297/lectureandseminartimetable/seminar5/sherlock_1998_berlin_moscow_and_bombay_and_indian_marxism.pdfTerdiman, Richard. Discourse-Counter Discourse. London: Cornell UP, 1985.
“We are Not Your Monkeys.” n.d.First Run ICARUS Films. Web.
Yechury, Sitaram. “Communalism, Religion and Marxism.”The Marxist. Vol 10.No.4,October1992.Web.