An Overview of Interdisciplinary Exploration of Writing

Authors

  • Sonali Mahanta

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24113/ijellh.v9i5.11062

Keywords:

Composition Studies, Interdisciplinary Nature, Evaluation And Exploration, Cognitive, Non-Cognitive, Hybrid-Cognitive

Abstract

Writing is an age-old tradition and thus the availability of theoretical explanations are also numerous. Both academically and non-academically, this skill has always been dealt with several approaches for exploring its various facets. Writing is the most preferred skill for determining literacy along with reading skill. The thematic and theoretical attempts have covered numerous discourse and can be categorised as cognitive, mix-cognitive and non-cognitive[1] approaches. This research paper attempts at making a theoretical evaluation and exploration of the available approaches to writing. The exploration of writing[2] as a discourse of knowledge reveals its interdisciplinary nature. Mix-cognitive signifies such perspectives that recognizes cognitive as well as non-cognitive explanations to writing. Writing and composition has been used interchangeably in this article.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Sonali Mahanta

Ph.D Research Scholar

Jawaharlal Nehru University

New Delhi, India

References

Alamargot, D. & Fayol, M. (2009). Modelling the Development of Written Composition. In Writing Development: Multiple Perspectives. July 2-9. Jeffery Hall, Institute of Education, London, UK.

Baker, C. (2001). Cognitive theories of bilingualism and the curriculum.

In Baker, C. (3rd ed.) Foundations of bilingual education and bilingualism,163-180. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters Ltd.

Barrot, J.S.(2018). Using the Sociocognitive-Transformative Approach in Writing Classrooms: Effects on L2 Learners' Writing Performance. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 34(2) 187-201.

Bhowmik, Subrata. (2017). Exploring the social nature of L2 writing: Insights into the division of labor of an EAP writing task. Language and Sociocultural Theory. 4. 124-155. 10.1558/lst.26454.

Brooks, F. B., & Donato, R. (1994). Vygotskyan approaches to understanding foreign language learner discourse during communicative tasks. Hispania, 77(2), 262–274. doi:10.2307/344508

study.

Bostard, etal. (2004). Bakhtinian Perspectives on Language and Culture. Meaning in Language, Art and New Media

Chandrasegaran, A. (2007). Applying a socio-cognitive model to the teaching of expository writing. Proceedings of the Redesigning pedagogy: culture, knowledge and understanding conference.

Cheung, YL., Ng, C.W., Donna,L.& Hari, J. (2019). The "Socio-Cognitive Approach To Writing" Intervention Programme. Singapore: Nanyang Technological University

Cheung, YL. Yin L.,Chu, Y.N.J.,& Jang, H.(2021). Impact of a Socio-Cognitive Approach to Teaching English Language Writing on Primary School Students' Compositions. Iranian Journal of Language Teaching Research, 922

C Rish, R. M., Bylen, K., Vreeland, H., & Wimberley, C. C. (2015). Using Google Drive to write dialogically with teachers. In M. L. Niess& H. W. Gillow-Wiles (Eds.), Handbook of research on teacher education in the digital age (pp. 357–379). Hershey, PA: IGI Global. doi:10.4018/978- 1-4666-8403-4

Hayes, J. R., & Flower, L. (1980). Identifying the organization of written processes. In L. W. Gregg, & E. R. Steinberg (Eds.). Cognitive processes in writing. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. 3-30

Hayes, J. R., & Flower, L. (1986). Writing research and the writer. American Psychologist, 41(10), 1106-1113.

Khatib, m. &Nima, s. (2013). On situating the stance of socio-cognitive approach to language

acquisition. Theory and practice in language studies. 3(9), pp.1590-1595.

Lantolf, J.P. (2000). Socio-Cultural Theory and Second Language Learning.Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Lantolf, P., & S. L. Thorne. (2007). Sociocultural theory and second language learning in Theories in Second Language Acquisition: An Introduction in B. van Patten and J. Williams, Eds., pp. 693–701, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. New Jersey: USA

Lee,E.J.(2011). Exploring L2 Writing Strategies from a Socio-cognitive Perspective: Mediated Actions, Goals, and Setting in L2 Writing. Doctoral Dissertation. The Ohio State University

Mohammadzadeh, A., Touran, A. &Mahnaz, S. (2020). A Sociocultural Perspective on Second Language Writing: The Effect of Symmetrical versus Asymmetrical Scaffolding on Intermediate EFL Learners’ Writing Accuracy, Fluency, and Complexity and Their Attitudes. Education Research International.2020.

Patrick, A.M. (2010). Sustaining Writing Theory. Composition Forum. Retrieved from: https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1080578.pdf

Schmitt, B.H. (1987). The Ecological Approach to Social Perception: A Conceptual Critique. Journal for the theory of social behaviour. 17.

Smidt, J. (2021). "Developing Discourse Roles and Positionings – An Ecological Theory of Writing Development." The SAGE Handbook of Writing Development. London: SAGE Publications. pp. 117-25.

Someren, M.V., Yvonne, B. &Jacobijn, S. (1994). The Think Aloud Method - A Practical Guide to Modelling CognitiveProcesses. Sandiego: Academic Press.

Tsui, A. B. M. (1996). Reticence and anxiety in second language learning. In K. Bailey & D. Nunan (Eds.), Voices from the Language Classroom. (pp. 145-167). New York: Cambridge University Press.

Wood, David S., Jerome S. Bruner, and Gail Ross. (1976). ‘‘The Role of Tutoring in Problem Solving.’’ Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry 17: 89–100.

Slavkovtest, N. (2015). Sociocultural Theory, The L2 Writing Process, And Google Drive: Strange Bedfellows? TESL Canada Journal. 81, 32(2).

Downloads

Published

28-05-2021

How to Cite

Mahanta, S. . (2021). An Overview of Interdisciplinary Exploration of Writing. SMART MOVES JOURNAL IJELLH, 9(5), 229–239. https://doi.org/10.24113/ijellh.v9i5.11062

Issue

Section

Article