Concept of Mimesis: A Phenomenon of Semiotic Interaction

Authors

  • Anand Soni
  • Dr. Anita Thakur

Abstract

In the past few decades, mimesis is comprehended as an important aspect to interface between literature, language and society, a phenomenon of semiotic interaction. By highlighting different semantic dimensions of the concept, mimesis is seen as being composed of various phases of interaction and as such, it is connected with imitation, depiction, iconicity and other semiotic concepts. The aim of this paper is to bring in potential possibilities for understanding and using the notion of mimesis in connection with some semiotic concepts and views.

‘Mimesis’ a Greek term which meant for Plato removed from reality and distortion is manipulated by Aristotle to mean something apparently better than reality. As Aristotle tried to put a new concept against Plato’s charge in the same way this paper focuses on possible concordances and structural analogies involved in imitation of foreign language in Indian society. This study will also reveal that any speaker can be good enough in expression but an artful skill is required to make an accurate and proper articulation. Thus the paper strongly supports the view that ‘Mimesis’ was probably not a notion with a single meaning even in the times when first mentioned in the literature. Therefore it is quite superficial to refer to it today as a single entity.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Anand Soni

Lecturer, Dept. of English

Shri Vaishnav Institute of Management

Indore (MP)

Dr. Anita Thakur

Associate Professor  Head

Dept. of Applied Sciences & Humanities

Acropolis Institute of Technology and Research

Indore (MP), India

References

Allott, R. . The Motor Theory of Language. In Studies in Language Origins II. Eds. W. von Raffler-Engel, J. Wind and A. Jonker. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 1991

Arbib, Michael A. 2002. The mirror system, imitation, and the evolution of language. In: Dautenhahn, Kerstin; Nehaniv, Chrystopher L. (eds.), Imitation in Animals and Artifacts. Cambridge: A Bradford Book, The MIT Press

Auerbach, Erich. 1953. Mimesis: The Representation of Reality in Western Literature. Princeton: Princeton UP. ISBN 069111336X.

Belfiore, Elizabeth, S., Tragic Pleasures: Aristotle on Plot and Emotion. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton UP (1992). ISBN 0691068992

Billard, A. and M.J. Mataric. Learning human arm movements by imitation: evaluation of a biologically inspired connectionist architecture. Robotics and Autonomous Systems 941 2001 1-16 2001

Breazeal, Cynthia; Scassellati, Brian 2002. Challenges in building robots that imitate people. In: Dautenhahn, Kerstin; Nehaniv, Chrystopher L. (eds.), Imitation in Animals and Artifacts.

Cambridge: A Bradford Book, The MIT Press

Butcher, S[amuel]. H[enry]., trans., Poetics of Aristotle. In Dukore [see below] (1974, 31-55).

Davis, Michael. 1999. The Poetry of Philosophy: On Aristotle's Poetics. South Bend, Indiana: St Augustine's P. ISBN 1890318620

Lieberman, P. Uniquely Human: Speech, Thought, and Selfless Behavior. Harvard University Press 1991.

Mataric, M.J. Learning by imitation.

Melberg, Arne 1995. Theories of Mimesis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Taussig, Michael. 1993. Mimesis and Alterity: A Particular History of the Senses. London and New York: Routledge.

Downloads

Published

28-11-2014

How to Cite

Soni , A., & Thakur , D. A. (2014). Concept of Mimesis: A Phenomenon of Semiotic Interaction. SMART MOVES JOURNAL IJELLH, 2(7), 11. Retrieved from https://ijellh.com/index.php/OJS/article/view/11492