Beyond the Jester: Pocket’s Multi-dimensional Trickster Identity in Christopher Moore’s The Serpent of Venice

Authors

  • P. V. Anjana
  • Dr. Francis O. S.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24113/ijellh.v12i5.11487

Keywords:

Trickster, Sacred being, Messenger of Gods, Ambiguity, Sexual Appetite

Abstract

The paper titled, “Beyond the Jester: Pocket’s Multi-dimensional Trickster Identity in Christopher Moore’s The Serpent of Venice” tries to dissect the trickster traits embodied in the character named Pocket, a fool in the novel. The paper defines as well as briefs out the major characteristic features attributed to the trickster figure in general. Pocket, the fool portrayed by Christopher Moore is different from that of Shakespeare’s fool. Shakespeare depicted Pocket only as a supporting character; whereas Moore’s Pocket is the main character. Moore characterized Pocket as a foolish, crude and crazy figure with good intentions which resembles a trickster. Tricksters are generally treated as the mythical characters commonly found in the folktales and mythology that carries specific traits that makes them different from that of a fool or jester or even clowns. Tricksters are also considered to be a source of humour or laughter that through their tales transmit some moral values. Pocket in The Serpent of Venice takes in some features which make it similar to the so-called mythical figure, trickster. Thus, the paper intends to analyse how trickster qualities like ambiguity, shape-shifting, sexual appetite, lying, boasting, and messenger/imitator of Gods and so on are present in the characteristic of the fool, Pocket which makes him different from Shakespeare’s representation.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

P. V. Anjana

Research Scholar in English

P.G. Department and Research Centre of English

Krishna Menon Memorial Govt. Women’s College

Kannur, Kerala, India

Dr. Francis O. S.

Supervisor, P.G. Department and Research Centre of English

Krishna Menon Memorial Govt. Women’s College

Kannur, Kerala, India

References

Blaeser, Kimberly M. “Trickster: A Compendium.” Buried Roots and Indestructible Seeds, edited by Mark A Lindquist and Martin Zanquer, Madison, U of Wisconsin P, 1994, p. 56.

Finch, Charles. “‘Serpent of Venice’ slithers from clever to crude.” USA TODAY, 2014, https://www.usatoday.com/story/life/books/2014/04/19/serpent-of-venice-novel/7739845/.

Hyde, Lewis. Trickster Makes This World: How Disruptive Imagination Creates Culture, Canongate Books, 2017.

Hynes, William. J and William G. Doty. Mythical Trickster Figures: Contours, Context, and Criticism, U of Alabama P, 1993, pp. 24, 34.

Kramer, Tina. “You’re Never Too Old to Laugh; An Adaption of Shakespeare’s Fool in the Modern Era.” Selected Paper of the Ohio Valley Shakespeare Conference, vol. 10, article 5, 2019, p. 44, https://ideaexchange.uakron.edu/spovsc/vol10/iss1/5.

Moore, Christopher. The Serpent of Venice, William Morrow, 2015, pp. 6, 7, 10, 12, 14, 23, 28, 70-74, 96, 192, 248, 317.

“Pocket, The Fool.” Fandom, https://serpent-of-venice.fandom.com/wiki/Pocket_The_Fool.

“Christopher Moore.” Wikipedia, https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christopher_Moore_(author).

“Shakespearean Tricksters.” Bloodrain Fire Dawn, 2012, https://www.deviantart.com/bloodrainfiredawn/journal/Shakespearean-Tricksters-329305097.

Downloads

Published

28-05-2024

How to Cite

Anjana, P. V., & O. S., D. F. (2024). Beyond the Jester: Pocket’s Multi-dimensional Trickster Identity in Christopher Moore’s The Serpent of Venice. SMART MOVES JOURNAL IJELLH, 12(5), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.24113/ijellh.v12i5.11487

Issue

Section

Article